Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Travis: jruby-9.1.13.0 #1408

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 13, 2017
Merged

Travis: jruby-9.1.13.0 #1408

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 13, 2017

Conversation

olleolleolle
Copy link
Contributor

This PR updates the CI matrix to use latest JRuby.

http://jruby.org/2017/09/06/jruby-9-1-13-0.html

@olleolleolle
Copy link
Contributor Author

olleolleolle commented Sep 12, 2017

@nateberkopec The failure is not on Travis, where I configured the change.

ragel ext/puma_http11/http11_parser.rl -C -G2 -I ext/puma_http11 -o ext/puma_http11/http11_parser.c
rake aborted!
Could not build wrapper using Ragel (it failed or not installed?)
C:/projects/puma/Rakefile:26:in `rescue in block in <top (required)>'
C:/projects/puma/Rakefile:23:in `block in <top (required)>'
Command failed with status (127): [ragel ext/puma_http11/http11_parser.rl -C ...]
C:/projects/puma/Rakefile:24:in `block in <top (required)>'
Tasks: TOP => default => test:all => test => compile => compile:x64-mingw32 => compile:puma_http11:x64-mingw32 => copy:puma_http11:x64-mingw32:2.2.6 => tmp/x64-mingw32/puma_http11/2.2.6/puma_http11.so => ext/puma_http11/http11_parser.c
(See full trace by running task with --trace)
Could not build wrapper using ragel

Failed AppVeyor build

@nateberkopec
Copy link
Member

Worked on restart

@nateberkopec nateberkopec merged commit cdb0547 into puma:master Sep 13, 2017
@olleolleolle olleolleolle deleted the patch-2 branch September 13, 2017 05:26
@olleolleolle
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you for maintaining this!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants